↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Assembly, Annotation, and Comparative Genomics in PATRIC, the All Bacterial Bioinformatics Resource Center
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Assembly, Annotation, and Comparative Genomics in PATRIC, the All Bacterial Bioinformatics Resource Center
Chapter number 4
Book title
Comparative Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7461-0, 978-1-4939-7463-4
Authors

Alice R. Wattam, Thomas Brettin, James J. Davis, Svetlana Gerdes, Ronald Kenyon, Dustin Machi, Chunhong Mao, Robert Olson, Ross Overbeek, Gordon D. Pusch, Maulik P. Shukla, Rick Stevens, Veronika Vonstein, Andrew Warren, Fangfang Xia, Hyunseung Yoo, Wattam, Alice R., Brettin, Thomas, Davis, James J., Gerdes, Svetlana, Kenyon, Ronald, Machi, Dustin, Mao, Chunhong, Olson, Robert, Overbeek, Ross, Pusch, Gordon D., Shukla, Maulik P., Stevens, Rick, Vonstein, Veronika, Warren, Andrew, Xia, Fangfang, Yoo, Hyunseung

Abstract

In the "big data" era, research biologists are faced with analyzing new types that usually require some level of computational expertise. A number of programs and pipelines exist, but acquiring the expertise to run them, and then understanding the output can be a challenge.The Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC, www.patricbrc.org ) has created an end-to-end analysis platform that allows researchers to take their raw reads, assemble a genome, annotate it, and then use a suite of user-friendly tools to compare it to any public data that is available in the repository. With close to 113,000 bacterial and more than 1000 archaeal genomes, PATRIC creates a unique research experience with "virtual integration" of private and public data. PATRIC contains many diverse tools and functionalities to explore both genome-scale and gene expression data, but the main focus of this chapter is on assembly, annotation, and the downstream comparative analysis functionality that is freely available in the resource.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Computer Science 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,961,684
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,729
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,728
of 442,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#508
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.