↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Pan-Genome Storage and Analysis Techniques
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pan-Genome Storage and Analysis Techniques
Chapter number 2
Book title
Comparative Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7461-0, 978-1-4939-7463-4
Authors

Tina Zekic, Guillaume Holley, Jens Stoye, Zekic, Tina, Holley, Guillaume, Stoye, Jens

Abstract

Computational pan-genome analysis has emerged from the rapid increase of available genome sequencing data. Starting from a microbial pan-genome, the concept has spread to a variety of species, such as plants or viruses. Characterizing a pan-genome provides insights into intra-species evolution, functions, and diversity. However, researchers face challenges such as processing and maintaining large datasets while providing accurate and efficient analysis approaches. Comparative genomics methods are required for detecting conserved and unique regions between a set of genomes. This chapter gives an overview of tools available for indexing pan-genomes, identifying the sub-regions of a pan-genome and offering a variety of downstream analysis methods. These tools are categorized into two groups, gene-based and sequence-based, according to the pan-genome identification method. We highlight the differences, advantages, and disadvantages between the tools, and provide information about the general workflow, methodology of pan-genome identification, covered functionalities, usability and availability of the tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Computer Science 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,950,290
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,733
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,426
of 442,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#152
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.