↓ Skip to main content

Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003241.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie M Pomeroy, Linda M King, Alex Pollock, Alison Baily-Hallam, Peter Langhorne

Abstract

Electrostimulation might improve motor recovery after stroke by providing neuromuscular re-training.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
Spain 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 29%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 14%
Engineering 21 11%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 34 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2015.
All research outputs
#9,618,849
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,018
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,955
of 272,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#214
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.