↓ Skip to main content

Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007379.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Li, Shao Liang Sun, Jin Hui Tian, KeHu Yang, Ruifeng Liu, Jun Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 13 9%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 51 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,508,180
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,802
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,369
of 360,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.