↓ Skip to main content

E-Health, another mechanism to recruit and retain healthcare professionals in remote areas: lessons learned from EQUI-ResHuS project in Mali

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
E-Health, another mechanism to recruit and retain healthcare professionals in remote areas: lessons learned from EQUI-ResHuS project in Mali
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12911-014-0120-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheick-Oumar Bagayoko, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Diakaridia Traoré, Abdrahamane Anne, Abdel Kader Traoré, Antoine Geissbuhler

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the perceived influence of telehealth on recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals in remote areas in Mali.MethodsAfter 15 months of diagnosis imaging training and telehealth activities at four project sites in remote Mali, between May 2011 and August 2012, a 75-item questionnaire was administered to healthcare professionals to assess the various factors related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), especially telehealth, and their influence on health personnel recruitment and retention. Questions assessing perceived impact of telehealth on recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals were rated on a five-point Likert scale. Dependent variables were perceived influence of ICT on recruitment and retention and independent variables were access to ICT, ICT training, ICT use, perceived benefits and drawbacks of telehealth, and perceived barriers to recruitment and retention. A multiple linear regression was performed to identify variables explaining the respondents¿ perceptions regarding telehealth influence on recruitment and retention.ResultsData analysis showed that professionals in remote areas have very positive perceptions of telehealth in general. Many benefits of telehealth for recruitment and retention were highlighted, with perceived benefits of ICT (p¿=¿0.0478), perceived effects of telehealth on recruitment (p¿=¿0.0018), telehealth training (0.0338) and information on telehealth (0.0073) being the strongest motivators for recruitment, while the perceived effects of telehealth on retention (p¿=¿0.0018) was the only factor significantly associated with retention.ConclusionsBased on our study results, telehealth could represent a mechanism for recruiting and retaining health professionals in remote areas and could reduce the isolation of these professionals through networking opportunities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 24%
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,186,847
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#273
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,336
of 353,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.