↓ Skip to main content

A review of different methods of assessing social cognitive function in clinical settings

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in psychiatry, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of different methods of assessing social cognitive function in clinical settings
Published in
Current opinion in psychiatry, January 2015
DOI 10.1097/yco.0000000000000139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie D. Henry, David G. Cowan, Teresa Lee, Perminder Sachdev

Abstract

Social cognition refers broadly to the way in which we process social information, and is a critical predictor of social competency. This article provides an overview of some of the assessment approaches that have been developed to assess this construct.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 30%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Unspecified 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 41%
Unspecified 5 19%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,012,849
of 11,333,547 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in psychiatry
#218
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,007
of 251,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in psychiatry
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,333,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.