You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Early Results from the COMPASS Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2994 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyaw L. Aung, Sandra E. Fischer, Robert E. Denroche, Gun-Ho Jang, Anna Dodd, Sean Creighton, Bernadette Southwood, Sheng-Ben Liang, Dianne Chadwick, Amy Zhang, Grainne M. O'Kane, Hamzeh Albaba, Shari Moura, Robert C. Grant, Jessica K. Miller, Faridah Mbabaali, Danielle Pasternack, Ilinca M. Lungu, John M.S. Bartlett, Sangeet Ghai, Mathieu Lemire, Spring Holter, Ashton A. Connor, Richard A. Moffitt, Jen Jen Yeh, Lee Timms, Paul M. Krzyzanowski, Neesha Dhani, David Hedley, Faiyaz Notta, Julie M. Wilson, Malcolm J. Moore, Steven Gallinger, Jennifer J. Knox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 50% |
| Scientists | 18 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 19% |
| Researcher | 43 | 15% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 89 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#711,384
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#432
of 13,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,228
of 354,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#7
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.