You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
From Sample to Data: Preparing, Obtaining, and Analyzing Images of Plant-Pathogen Interactions Using Confocal Microscopy
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 20 |
Book title |
Host-Pathogen Interactions
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7604-1_20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7603-4, 978-1-4939-7604-1
|
Authors |
Helen N. Fones, George R. Littlejohn |
Abstract |
This chapter describes the steps needed to inoculate host plants with a fungus of interest, and subsequently to visualize the infection using confocal microscopy. As an exemplar, we consider the interaction between wheat and the Septoria leaf blotch fungus, Zymoseptoria tritici. This method is easiest when a GFP- or other fluorophore-tagged strain of the studied fungus is available, but notes are also provided which describe possible staining techniques which may be employed if fluorescent fungus is unavailable in your system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,963,216
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,729
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,735
of 442,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#508
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.