↓ Skip to main content

Priming healthy eating. You can't prime all the people all of the time

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Priming healthy eating. You can't prime all the people all of the time
Published in
Appetite, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanna E. Forwood, Amy L. Ahern, Gareth J. Hollands, Yin-Lam Ng, Theresa M. Marteau

Abstract

In the context of a food purchasing environment filled with advertising and promotions, and an increased desire from policy makers to guide individuals toward choosing healthier foods, this study tests whether priming methods that use healthy food adverts to increase preference for healthier food generalize to a representative population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 141 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Unspecified 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 32%
Social Sciences 19 13%
Unspecified 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Other 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#804,218
of 12,213,129 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#625
of 2,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,572
of 271,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#26
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,213,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.