↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case–control study using electronic records

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case–control study using electronic records
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp15x683545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A Shephard, Richard D Neal, Peter Rose, Fiona M Walter, Emma J Litt, William T Hamilton

Abstract

Patients with myeloma experience the longest diagnostic delays compared with patients with other cancers in the UK; 37% are diagnosed through emergency presentations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Unspecified 8 12%
Other 8 12%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 38%
Unspecified 18 26%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,267,093
of 12,981,426 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,152
of 2,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,354
of 275,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,981,426 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.