↓ Skip to main content

Microwave treatment of human milk to prevent transmission of Chagas disease

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microwave treatment of human milk to prevent transmission of Chagas disease
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, January 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0036-46652003000100008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cláudio Santos Ferreira, Vicente Amato Neto, Erika Gakiyai, Rita Cristina Bezerra, Ruth Semira Rodríguez Alarcón

Abstract

It is recognized that breast feeding is an alternative means of transmission of Chagas disease. However, thermal treatment of milk can prevent this occurrence. As domestic microwave ovens are becoming commonplace, the efficacy of microwave thermal treatment in inactivating Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes in human milk was tested. Human milk samples infected with T. cruzi trypomastigotes (Y strain) from laboratory-infected mice, were heated to 63 degrees C in a domestic microwave oven (2,450 MHz, 700 W). Microscopical and serological examinations demonstrated that none of the animals inoculated orally or intraperitoneally with infected milk which had been treated, got the infection, while those inoculated with untreated, infected milk, became infected. It was concluded that the simple treatment prescribed, which can easily be done at home, was effective in inactivating T. cruzi trypomastigotes contained in human milk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,620,912
of 21,131,454 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
#59
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,828
of 320,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,131,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.