You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of mediation analysis to assess the effects of a behaviour change communication strategy on bed net ideation and household universal coverage in Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-014-0531-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily E Ricotta, Marc Boulay, Robert Ainslie, Stella Babalola, Megan Fotheringham, Hannah Koenker, Matthew Lynch |
| Abstract |
SBCC campaigns are designed to act on cognitive, social and emotional factors at the individual or community level. The combination of these factors, referred to as 'ideation', play a role in determining behaviour by reinforcing and confirming decisions about a particular health topic. This study introduces ideation theory and mediation analysis as a way to evaluate the impact of a malaria SBCC campaign in Tanzania, to determine whether exposure to a communication programme influenced universal coverage through mediating ideational variables. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Psychology | 22 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,277,372
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,765
of 5,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,265
of 351,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#31
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.