↓ Skip to main content

Reference ranges for rotational thromboelastometry in male Sprague Dawley rats

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reference ranges for rotational thromboelastometry in male Sprague Dawley rats
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12959-017-0154-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Vigiola Cruz, Jenna N. Luker, Bonnie C. Carney, Kathleen E. Brummel-Ziedins, Maria-Cristina Bravo, Thomas Orfeo, Jason H. Chen, Lauren T. Moffatt, Jeffrey W. Shupp

Abstract

A functional coagulation assay was used to investigate the extrinsic pathway of coagulation on citrated whole blood samples from healthy adult male Sprague Dawley rats using the mini cup and pin system. Reference values for coagulation parameters from forty-three animals were calculated using data obtained from the ROTEM® delta hemostasis analyzer with the EXTEM test. The following ranges, presented as the 2.5-97.5 percentiles, were established: CT [18-77], CFT [20-80], α [73-86], MCF [53-70], and ML [1-22], along with others. These reference ranges can be used in future studies in rats to identify clinically significant coagulopathies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#9,875,723
of 12,371,547 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#122
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,872
of 350,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.