The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Vialation
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.imhl1-1801 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dino Maglić |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 30% |
Spain | 3 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Oman | 1 | 4% |
Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
Scientists | 7 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,539,055
of 26,729,497 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#750
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,005
of 457,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#26
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,729,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.