↓ Skip to main content

Law, Ethics, and Conversations between Physicians and Patients about Firearms in the Home

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Law, Ethics, and Conversations between Physicians and Patients about Firearms in the Home
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.1.hlaw1-1801
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Firearms in the home pose a risk to household members, including homicide, suicide, and unintentional deaths. Medical societies urge clinicians to counsel patients about those risks as part of sound medical practice. Depending on the circumstances, clinicians might recommend safe firearm storage, temporary removal of the firearm from the home, or other measures. Certain state firearm laws, however, might present legal and ethical challenges for physicians who counsel patients about guns in the home. Specifically, we discuss state background check laws for gun transfers, safe gun storage laws, and laws forbidding physicians from engaging in certain firearm-related conversations with their patients. Medical professionals should be aware of these and other state gun laws but should offer anticipatory guidance when clinically appropriate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%