↓ Skip to main content

Influence of the route of exposure and the matrix on the sensitisation potency of a major cows’ milk allergen

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of the route of exposure and the matrix on the sensitisation potency of a major cows’ milk allergen
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13601-015-0047-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Wavrin, Herve Bernard, Jean-Michel Wal, Karine Adel-Patient

Abstract

Allergic sensitisation to food may occur through non-gastrointestinal routes such as via skin or lung. We recently demonstrated in mice that cutaneous or respiratory pre-exposures to peanut proteins on intact epithelia induce a Th2 priming and allow subsequent oral sensitization without the use of adjuvant. We then aimed to assess the impact of a similar pattern of exposure to another relevant food allergen, cows' milk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#519
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,499
of 361,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.