↓ Skip to main content

RECOVERY OF LITTLE BROWN BATS (MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS) FROM NATURAL INFECTION WITH GEOMYCES DESTRUCTANS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RECOVERY OF LITTLE BROWN BATS (MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS) FROM NATURAL INFECTION WITH GEOMYCES DESTRUCTANS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 2011
DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-47.3.618
Authors

Carol Uphoff Meteyer, Mick Valent, Jackie Kashmer, Elizabeth L. Buckles, Jeffrey M. Lorch, David S. Blehert, Amanda Lollar, Douglas Berndt, Emily Wheeler, C. LeAnn White, Anne E. Ballmann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
Canada 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 123 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Master 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Other 16 12%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 3 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 62%
Environmental Science 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 6 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,201,807
of 13,953,650 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#135
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,544
of 397,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,953,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.