You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administrative Science Quarterly, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0001839217750826 |
| Authors |
Wendy K. Smith, Marya L. Besharov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 48% |
| Scientists | 14 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 850 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 222 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 72 | 8% |
| Researcher | 59 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 152 | 18% |
| Unknown | 210 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 371 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 105 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 27 | 3% |
| Psychology | 25 | 3% |
| Engineering | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 10% |
| Unknown | 224 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#938,201
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Administrative Science Quarterly
#125
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,035
of 453,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administrative Science Quarterly
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.