↓ Skip to main content

Proxy evidence for an El Niño-like response to volcanic forcing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
67 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
386 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Proxy evidence for an El Niño-like response to volcanic forcing
Published in
Nature, November 2003
DOI 10.1038/nature02101
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Brad Adams, Michael E. Mann, Caspar M. Ammann

Abstract

Past studies have suggested a statistical connection between explosive volcanic eruptions and subsequent El Niño climate events. This connection, however, has remained controversial. Here we present support for a response of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon to forcing from explosive volcanism by using two different palaeoclimate reconstructions of El Niño activity and two independent, proxy-based chronologies of explosive volcanic activity from ad 1649 to the present. We demonstrate a significant, multi-year, El Niño-like response to explosive tropical volcanic forcing over the past several centuries. The results imply roughly a doubling of the probability of an El Niño event occurring in the winter following a volcanic eruption. Our empirical findings shed light on how the tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system may respond to exogenous (both natural and anthropogenic) radiative forcing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Chile 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 339 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 99 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 15%
Student > Master 39 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 34 9%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 43 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 176 48%
Environmental Science 59 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 11%
Physics and Astronomy 12 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 50 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#494,197
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#22,481
of 98,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#394
of 57,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#17
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.