↓ Skip to main content

Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005967.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Sinclair, Sarah Donegan, Rachel Isba, David G Lalloo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 215 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Researcher 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 51 23%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 35 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,036,831
of 16,190,260 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,833
of 11,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,022
of 292,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,190,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.