↓ Skip to main content

Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005967.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Sinclair, Sarah Donegan, Rachel Isba, David G Lalloo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 276 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 43 15%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Postgraduate 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 49 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 66 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,525,062
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,504
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,572
of 167,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.