You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prophylactic caffeine to prevent postoperative apnoea following general anaesthesia in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J Henderson-Smart, Peter A Steer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,941
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,413
of 43,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.