↓ Skip to main content

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005960.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas GH Mohtadi, Denise S Chan, Katie N Dainty, Daniel B Whelan

Abstract

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) commonly involves patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon(s) (HT) autografts. There is no consensus with respect to the choice between these two grafts in ACL surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 303 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 19%
Student > Master 50 16%
Unspecified 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 32 10%
Other 97 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 48%
Unspecified 54 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Sports and Recreations 27 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Other 37 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,501,168
of 13,784,591 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,591
of 10,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,121
of 281,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#228
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,784,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.