↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003539.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra R Arnold, Sharon E Straus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 322 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 22%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Other 80 24%
Unknown 36 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 6%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 51 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,146,722
of 12,452,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,000
of 8,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,618
of 269,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,452,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.