↓ Skip to main content

Increasing access to institutional deliveries using demand and supply side incentives: early results from a quasi-experimental study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing access to institutional deliveries using demand and supply side incentives: early results from a quasi-experimental study
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-11-s1-s11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Peter Waiswa, M Hafizur Rahman, Fred Makumbi, Noah Kiwanuka, Olico Okui, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, John Bua, Aloysius Mutebi, Gorette Nalwadda, David Serwadda, George W Pariyo, David H Peters

Abstract

Geographical inaccessibility, lack of transport, and financial burdens are some of the demand side constraints to maternal health services in Uganda, while supply side problems include poor quality services related to unmotivated health workers and inadequate supplies. Most public health interventions in Uganda have addressed only selected supply side issues, and universities have focused their efforts on providing maternal services at tertiary hospitals. To demonstrate how reforms at Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MakCHS) can lead to making systemic changes that can improve maternal health services, a demand and supply side strategy was developed by working with local communities and national stakeholders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 200 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 26%
Researcher 50 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Other 11 5%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 28%
Social Sciences 39 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 31 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,443
of 17,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,027
of 119,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#51
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.