| Title |
Trade and the equitability of global food nutrient distribution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-017-0008-6 |
| Authors |
Stephen A. Wood, Matthew R. Smith, Jessica Fanzo, Roseline Remans, Ruth S. DeFries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 21% |
| Belgium | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 15 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 22% |
| Researcher | 57 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#742,202
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#482
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,159
of 455,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 127.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.