↓ Skip to main content

Ancient maize from Chacoan great houses: Where was it grown?

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ancient maize from Chacoan great houses: Where was it grown?
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2135068100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larry Benson, Linda Cordell, Kirk Vincent, Howard Taylor, John Stein, G. Lang Farmer, Kiyoto Futa

Abstract

In this article, we compare chemical (87Sr/86Sr and elemental) analyses of archaeological maize from dated contexts within Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, to potential agricultural sites on the periphery of the San Juan Basin. The oldest maize analyzed from Pueblo Bonito probably was grown in an area located 80 km to the west at the base of the Chuska Mountains. The youngest maize came from the San Juan or Animas river floodplains 90 km to the north. This article demonstrates that maize, a dietary staple of southwestern Native Americans, was transported over considerable distances in pre-Columbian times, a finding fundamental to understanding the organization of pre-Columbian southwestern societies. In addition, this article provides support for the hypothesis that major construction events in Chaco Canyon were made possible because maize was brought in to support extra-local labor forces.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Portugal 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Arts and Humanities 10 11%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,219,054
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64,491
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,323
of 56,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#281
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.