↓ Skip to main content

Polycythemia vera treatment algorithm 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Cancer Journal, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,275)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
163 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polycythemia vera treatment algorithm 2018
Published in
Blood Cancer Journal, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41408-017-0042-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayalew Tefferi, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Tiziano Barbui

Abstract

Recently reported mature survival data have confirmed the favorable prognosis in polycythemia vera (PV), with an estimated median survival of 24 years, in patients younger than age 60 years old. Currently available drugs for PV have not been shown to prolong survival or alter the natural history of the disease and are instead indicated primarily for prevention of thrombosis. Unfortunately, study endpoints that are being utilized in currently ongoing clinical trials in PV do not necessarily target clinically or biologically relevant outcomes, such as thrombosis, survival, or morphologic remission, and are instead focused on components of disease palliation. Even more discouraging has been the lack of critical appraisal from "opinion leaders", on the added value of newly approved drugs. Keeping these issues in mind, at present, we continue to advocate conservative management in low-risk PV (phlebotomy combined with once- or twice-daily aspirin therapy) and include cytoreductive therapy in "high-risk" patients; in the latter regard, our first, second, and third line drugs of choice are hydroxyurea, pegylated interferon-α and busulfan, respectively. In addition, it is reasonable to consider JAK2 inhibitor therapy, in the presence of protracted pruritus or markedly enlarged splenomegaly shown to be refractory to the aforementioned drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 314 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Other 37 12%
Student > Postgraduate 34 11%
Student > Master 25 8%
Researcher 24 8%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 98 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 99 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#361,285
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Journal
#25
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,331
of 451,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Journal
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.