↓ Skip to main content

Wound drains following thyroid surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wound drains following thyroid surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kumarakrishnan Samraj, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Other 25 28%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,135,253
of 14,504,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,039
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,170
of 399,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,504,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.