↓ Skip to main content

Privacy and human behavior in the age of information

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
195 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1057 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1125 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Published in
Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa1465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, George Loewenstein

Abstract

This Review summarizes and draws connections between diverse streams of empirical research on privacy behavior. We use three themes to connect insights from social and behavioral sciences: people's uncertainty about the consequences of privacy-related behaviors and their own preferences over those consequences; the context-dependence of people's concern, or lack thereof, about privacy; and the degree to which privacy concerns are malleable—manipulable by commercial and governmental interests. Organizing our discussion by these themes, we offer observations concerning the role of public policy in the protection of privacy in the information age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1098 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 235 21%
Student > Master 175 16%
Researcher 99 9%
Student > Bachelor 99 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 7%
Other 175 16%
Unknown 265 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 223 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 188 17%
Social Sciences 151 13%
Psychology 62 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 54 5%
Other 141 13%
Unknown 306 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 524. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#49,314
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,930
of 83,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#455
of 363,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#36
of 1,195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.