↓ Skip to main content

New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 1,248)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?
Published in
Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Unspecified 29 14%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Postgraduate 24 12%
Other 21 10%
Other 69 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 52%
Unspecified 35 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Other 15 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#319,934
of 13,375,725 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#32
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,005
of 384,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,375,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.