You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 46% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 49% |
| Scientists | 11 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 312 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 23% |
| Unknown | 58 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 149 | 48% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2018.
All research outputs
#832,307
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#153
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,053
of 453,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.