↓ Skip to main content

New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,359)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New US blood-pressure guidelines — who asked the patients?
Published in
Nature Reviews Cardiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 316 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Postgraduate 34 11%
Other 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Other 75 24%
Unknown 58 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 63 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#413,764
of 15,352,980 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#48
of 1,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,544
of 405,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,352,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.