↓ Skip to main content

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005603.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petsky, Helen L, Kynaston, Jennifer A, Turner, Cathy, Li, Albert, Cates, Christopher J, Lasserson, Toby J, Chang, Anne B

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Student > Master 6 21%
Other 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 59%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,453,662
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from this source
#4,951
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,199
of 274,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#145
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.