↓ Skip to main content

Family conference in palliative care: concept analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family conference in palliative care: concept analysis
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudval Souza da Silva, Géssica Sodré Sampaio Trindade, Gilvânia Patrícia do Nascimento Paixão, Maria Júlia Paes da Silva

Abstract

to analyze the attributes, antecedents and consequents of the family conference concept. Walker and Avante's method for concept analysis and the stages of the integrative review process, with a selection of publications in the PubMed, Cinahl and Lilacs databases focusing on the family conference theme in the context of palliative care. the most cited antecedents were the presence of doubts and the need to define a care plan. Family reunion and working instrument were evidenced as attributes. With respect to consequents, to promote the effective communication and to establish a plan of consensual action were the most remarkable elements. the scarcity of publications on the subject was observed, as well as and the limitation of the empirical studies to the space of intensive therapy. Thus, by analyzing the attributes, antecedents and consequents of the concept it was possible to follow their evolution and to show their efficacy and effectiveness as a therapeutic intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Psychology 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,281,392
of 19,311,167 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#163
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,123
of 426,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,311,167 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.