↓ Skip to main content

Controlled cord traction for the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlled cord traction for the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008020.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, Nolundi T Mshweshwe, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 23%
Student > Master 39 18%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 27%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 52 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#963,240
of 15,521,638 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,724
of 11,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,518
of 288,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,521,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.