You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004250.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Gross, Theresa M Kay, Jean‐Philippe Paquin, Samuel Blanchette, Patrick Lalonde, Trevor Christie, Genevieve Dupont, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Geoff Gelley, Charles H Goldsmith, Mario Forget, Jan L Hoving, Gert Brønfort, Pasqualina L Santaguida, Cervical Overview Group |
| Abstract |
Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. Exercise is one treatment approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 19% |
| Spain | 17 | 14% |
| Canada | 8 | 7% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 69% |
| Scientists | 21 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1430 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 256 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 205 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 8% |
| Researcher | 97 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 90 | 6% |
| Other | 276 | 19% |
| Unknown | 410 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 364 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 311 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 68 | 5% |
| Psychology | 52 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 3% |
| Other | 160 | 11% |
| Unknown | 455 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#379,638
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#654
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,566
of 362,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.