↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007752.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally M Reid, Philippa Middleton, Mary C Cossich, Caroline A Crowther, Emily Bain

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been enhanced awareness of the appreciable morbidity of thyroid dysfunction, particularly thyroid deficiency. Since treating clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism may reduce adverse obstetric outcomes, it is crucial to identify which interventions are safe and effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 189 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 26 13%
Unspecified 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Other 60 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 59%
Unspecified 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#939,828
of 13,110,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,966
of 10,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,708
of 275,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,110,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.