You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction to: Medicinal plants used by women in Mecca: urban, Muslim and gendered knowledge
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13002-017-0197-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Afnan Alqethami, Julie A. Hawkins, Irene Teixidor-Toneu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 17% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#516
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,069
of 439,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.