↓ Skip to main content

Inclusive development and prioritization of review questions in a highly controversial field of regulatory science

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inclusive development and prioritization of review questions in a highly controversial field of regulatory science
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0113-z
Authors

Armin Spök, Monica Racovita, Sandra Karner, Gloria Adduci, Greet Smets, Patrick Rüdelsheim, Christian Kohl, Ralf Wilhelm, Joachim Schiemann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 39%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 26%
Environmental Science 5 22%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,597,855
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#108
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,849
of 455,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.