↓ Skip to main content

Snake fungal disease in North America: U.S. Geological Survey Updates

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Snake fungal disease in North America: U.S. Geological Survey Updates
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/fs20173064
Authors

Thompson, Noelle E., Lankau, Emily W. , Moede Rogall, Gail, Noelle E. Thompson, Emily W. Lankau, Gail Moede Rogall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,449,434
of 15,772,619 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#159
of 1,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,097
of 366,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#12
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,772,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.