You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001310.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon Hosker, June D Cody, Christine C Norton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,525,125
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,780
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,427
of 78,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.