↓ Skip to main content

Medical interventions for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical interventions for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003167.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clemens Vass, Cornelia Hirn, Thomas Sycha, Oliver Findl, Stefan Sacu, Peter Bauer, Leopold Schmetterer

Abstract

Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is a progressive optic neuropathy with an elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), where the optic nerve head becomes pathologically excavated and the visual field (VF) is characteristically altered. Ocular hypertension (OHT) is a condition with elevated IOP but without discernible pathology of the optic nerve head or the VF. It is a major risk factor for development of POAG.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 39 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,199,210
of 16,722,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,949
of 11,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,355
of 292,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,722,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.