You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Perseus: A Bioinformatics Platform for Integrative Analysis of Proteomics Data in Cancer Research
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Cancer Systems Biology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7492-4, 978-1-4939-7493-1
|
| Authors |
Stefka Tyanova, Juergen Cox |
| Abstract |
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is a continuously growing field marked by technological and methodological improvements. Cancer proteomics is aimed at pursuing goals such as accurate diagnosis, patient stratification, and biomarker discovery, relying on the richness of information of quantitative proteome profiles. Translating these high-dimensional data into biological findings of clinical importance necessitates the use of robust and powerful computational tools and methods. In this chapter, we provide a detailed description of standard analysis steps for a clinical proteomics dataset performed in Perseus, a software for functional analysis of large-scale quantitative omics data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 640 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 640 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 23% |
| Researcher | 102 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 82 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 10% |
| Unknown | 147 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 213 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 68 | 11% |
| Unknown | 175 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,092,453
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#341
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,611
of 442,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.