↓ Skip to main content

Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeosciences, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
Published in
Biogeosciences, January 2018
DOI 10.5194/bg-15-429-2018
Authors

Kukka-Maaria Erkkilä, Anne Ojala, David Bastviken, Tobias Biermann, Jouni J. Heiskanen, Anders Lindroth, Olli Peltola, Miitta Rantakari, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 36%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Unspecified 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 47%
Unspecified 16 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,070,832
of 12,470,921 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#374
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,628
of 339,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#23
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,470,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.