You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacto dos tipos de incontinência urinária na qualidade de vida de mulheres
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2016032603266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dayana Maia Saboia, Mariana Luisa Veras Firmiano, Karine de Castro Bezerra, José Ananias Vasconcelos, Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá, Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos |
| Abstract |
To identify the most frequent type of urinary incontinence in women assisted in two outpatient clinics of urogynecology, and to compare general and specific quality of life among the different types of incontinence measured through validated questionnaires. Cross-sectional study conducted at the urogynecology outpatient clinic. The following questionnaires were used for quality of life assessment: Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). The study included 556 women. Mixed Urinary Incontinence was the most frequent type (n=348/62.6%), followed by Stress Urinary Incontinence (n=173/31.1%) and Urge Urinary Incontinence (n=35/6.3%). Women with mixed urinary incontinence had greater impact on the general (SF-36) and specific quality of life (KHQ and ICIQ-SF) compared to the others (p<0.05). In the evaluation of sexual function (PISQ-12), there was no difference between groups (p=0.28). All types of urinary incontinence interfere both in the general and specific quality of life, but women with mixed urinary incontinence are the most affected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#192
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,982
of 447,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.