↓ Skip to main content

Impacto dos tipos de incontinência urinária na qualidade de vida de mulheres

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacto dos tipos de incontinência urinária na qualidade de vida de mulheres
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2017
DOI 10.1590/s1980-220x2016032603266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saboia, Dayana Maia, Firmiano, Mariana Luisa Veras, Bezerra, Karine de Castro, Vasconcelos Neto, José Ananias, Oriá, Mônica Oliveira Batista, Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira, Dayana Maia Saboia, Mariana Luisa Veras Firmiano, Karine de Castro Bezerra, José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto, Mônica Oliveira Batista Oriá, Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos

Abstract

To identify the most frequent type of urinary incontinence in women assisted in two outpatient clinics of urogynecology, and to compare general and specific quality of life among the different types of incontinence measured through validated questionnaires. Cross-sectional study conducted at the urogynecology outpatient clinic. The following questionnaires were used for quality of life assessment: Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF), King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). The study included 556 women. Mixed Urinary Incontinence was the most frequent type (n=348/62.6%), followed by Stress Urinary Incontinence (n=173/31.1%) and Urge Urinary Incontinence (n=35/6.3%). Women with mixed urinary incontinence had greater impact on the general (SF-36) and specific quality of life (KHQ and ICIQ-SF) compared to the others (p<0.05). In the evaluation of sexual function (PISQ-12), there was no difference between groups (p=0.28). All types of urinary incontinence interfere both in the general and specific quality of life, but women with mixed urinary incontinence are the most affected.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,008,063
of 12,416,981 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#69
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,785
of 339,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,416,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.