↓ Skip to main content

Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002111.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Norton, June D Cody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 231 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 58 25%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 12%
Psychology 14 6%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 52 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,461,526
of 13,337,613 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,322
of 10,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,293
of 277,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.