↓ Skip to main content

低圧負荷の前庭機能に及ぼす影響に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 177)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
低圧負荷の前庭機能に及ぼす影響に関する研究
Published in
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, March 2008
DOI 10.3950/jibiinkoka.71.1574
Authors

松村 康一

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,291,154
of 12,401,157 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#40
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,731
of 339,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,401,157 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them