You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A first generation whole genome RH map of the river buffalo with comparison to domestic cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Elisabete J Amaral, Jason R Grant, Penny K Riggs, Nedenia B Stafuzza, Edson A Rodrigues Filho, Tom Goldammer, Rosemarie Weikard, Ronald M Brunner, Kelli J Kochan, Anthony J Greco, Jooha Jeong, Zhipeng Cai, Guohui Lin, Aparna Prasad, Satish Kumar, G Pardha Saradhi, Boby Mathew, M Aravind Kumar, Melissa N Miziara, Paola Mariani, Alexandre R Caetano, Stephan R Galvão, Madhu S Tantia, Ramesh K Vijh, Bina Mishra, ST Bharani Kumar, Vanderlei A Pelai, Andre M Santana, Larissa C Fornitano, Brittany C Jones, Humberto Tonhati, Stephen Moore, Paul Stothard, James E Womack |
| Abstract |
The recently constructed river buffalo whole-genome radiation hybrid panel (BBURH5000) has already been used to generate preliminary radiation hybrid (RH) maps for several chromosomes, and buffalo-bovine comparative chromosome maps have been constructed. Here, we present the first-generation whole genome RH map (WG-RH) of the river buffalo generated from cattle-derived markers. The RH maps aligned to bovine genome sequence assembly Btau_4.0, providing valuable comparative mapping information for both species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,120
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,669
of 182,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#57
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.