↓ Skip to main content

A first generation whole genome RH map of the river buffalo with comparison to domestic cattle

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A first generation whole genome RH map of the river buffalo with comparison to domestic cattle
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-631
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Elisabete J Amaral, Jason R Grant, Penny K Riggs, Nedenia B Stafuzza, Edson Filho, Tom Goldammer, Rosemarie Weikard, Ronald M Brunner, Kelli J Kochan, Anthony J Greco, Jooha Jeong, Zhipeng Cai, Guohui Lin, Aparna Prasad, Satish Kumar, G Pardha Saradhi, Boby Mathew, M Aravind Kumar, Melissa N Miziara, Paola Mariani, Alexandre R Caetano, Stephan R Galvão, Madhu S Tantia, Ramesh K Vijh, Bina Mishra, ST Bharani Kumar, Vanderlei A Pelai, Andre M Santana, Larissa C Fornitano, Brittany C Jones, Humberto Tonhati, Stephen Moore, Paul Stothard, James E Womack

Abstract

The recently constructed river buffalo whole-genome radiation hybrid panel (BBURH5000) has already been used to generate preliminary radiation hybrid (RH) maps for several chromosomes, and buffalo-bovine comparative chromosome maps have been constructed. Here, we present the first-generation whole genome RH map (WG-RH) of the river buffalo generated from cattle-derived markers. The RH maps aligned to bovine genome sequence assembly Btau_4.0, providing valuable comparative mapping information for both species.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 4%
India 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,984,688
of 12,733,544 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,732
of 7,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,305
of 275,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#130
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,733,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.