You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental DNA (eDNA): A tool for quantifying the abundant but elusive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0191720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meredith B. Nevers, Murulee N. Byappanahalli, Charles C. Morris, Dawn Shively, Kasia Przybyla-Kelly, Ashley M. Spoljaric, Joshua Dickey, Edward F. Roseman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,433,505
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,564
of 223,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,517
of 452,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#944
of 3,502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.