↓ Skip to main content

Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review
Published in
BJGP Open, January 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101337
Authors

Nicholas D Gollop, John Ford, Pieter Mackeith, Caroline Thurlow, Rachel Wakelin, Nicholas Steel, Robert Fleetcroft

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#823,535
of 10,466,958 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#22
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,969
of 271,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,466,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.