↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic and coalescent analysis of three loci suggest that the Water Rail is divisible into two species, Rallus aquaticus and R. indicus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic and coalescent analysis of three loci suggest that the Water Rail is divisible into two species, Rallus aquaticus and R. indicus
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika S Tavares, Gerard HJ de Kroon, Allan J Baker

Abstract

Water Rails (Rallus aquaticus) inhabit fragmented freshwater wetlands across their Palearctic distribution. Disjunct populations are now thought to be morphologically similar over their vast geographic range, though four subspecies had been recognized previously. The fossil record suggests that Water Rails (R. aquaticus) were already spread across the Palearctic by the Pleistocene approximately 2 million years ago, and the oldest fossil remains thought to be closely related to the common ancestor of water rails date from the Pliocene.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 21 30%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 81%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,083
of 104,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#32
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.