↓ Skip to main content

Intra-oral orthosis vs amitriptyline in chronic tension-type headache: a clinical and laser evoked potentials study

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Face Medicine, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intra-oral orthosis vs amitriptyline in chronic tension-type headache: a clinical and laser evoked potentials study
Published in
Head & Face Medicine, May 2006
DOI 10.1186/1746-160x-2-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina de Tommaso, Elliott Shevel, Carla Pecoraro, Michele Sardaro, Daniela Divenere, Olimpia Di fruscolo, Paolo Lamberti, Paolo Livrea

Abstract

In the present study, we examined clinical and laser-evoked potentials (LEP) features in two groups of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) patients treated with two different approaches: intra-oral appliance of prosthesis, aiming to reduce muscular tenderness, and 10 mg daily amitriptyline.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#53
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,929
of 65,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them